The below commentary and associated comments contains
some interesting comments about the process of peer-review.
Ploegh, H., 2011, End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer
experiments. Nature. vol. 472, no. 7344, p. 391.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20110428
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html
“Peer review of scientific papers in top journals is bogged
down by unnecessary demands for extra lab work, argues
Hidde Ploegh.”
Peer review demands for extra experiments are "wasteful
tyranny" - http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2011/04/27/peer-review-demands-for-extra-experiments-are-wasteful-tyranny/
Yours,
Paul H.
some interesting comments about the process of peer-review.
Ploegh, H., 2011, End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer
experiments. Nature. vol. 472, no. 7344, p. 391.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20110428
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html
“Peer review of scientific papers in top journals is bogged
down by unnecessary demands for extra lab work, argues
Hidde Ploegh.”
Peer review demands for extra experiments are "wasteful
tyranny" - http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2011/04/27/peer-review-demands-for-extra-experiments-are-wasteful-tyranny/
Yours,
Paul H.
No comments:
Post a Comment