Hi,
It is utterly amazing what gets occasionally past peer-review.
According to the web page of Mediterranean Archaeology &
Archaeometry, articles submitted to this journal "...are subject
to a minimum of two external peer reviews." Obviously,
something went horribly wrong with the peer-review process
in the case of the below article.
Jaye, M., 2019. The Flooding of the Mediterranean
Basin at the Younger-Dryas Boundary. Mediterranean
Archaeology & Archaeometry, 19(1).
http://maajournal.com/Issues2019a.php and
http://maajournal.com/#mw999
At its bottom, there is a note on Jaye's web page at:
https://theworldwideflood.com/author/theworldwideflood/
"PS I submitted this essay in Nov 2017 to the National
Association of Scholars who declined to publish it because
it did not fit within our current editorial plans for Academic
Questions.???"
An earlier example of the abject failure of peer-review
in archaeology is:
Cholleti, E.R., Vaddadi, K. and Yadav, A.H.K., 2017.
Puratana Aakasha-Yantrika Nirmana Sadhanavasthu
(Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials).
Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(8), pp.7704-7713.
Apparently, the editors had a change of mind and the
"Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials"
paper was only a couple of months ago retracted.
RETRACTED: Puratana Aakasha-Yantrika Nirmana Sadhanavasthu
(Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785317314001
Have fun,
Paul
Paul V. Heinrich
9887 Kinglet drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Heinrich4
It is utterly amazing what gets occasionally past peer-review.
According to the web page of Mediterranean Archaeology &
Archaeometry, articles submitted to this journal "...are subject
to a minimum of two external peer reviews." Obviously,
something went horribly wrong with the peer-review process
in the case of the below article.
Jaye, M., 2019. The Flooding of the Mediterranean
Basin at the Younger-Dryas Boundary. Mediterranean
Archaeology & Archaeometry, 19(1).
http://maajournal.com/Issues2019a.php and
http://maajournal.com/#mw999
At its bottom, there is a note on Jaye's web page at:
https://theworldwideflood.com/author/theworldwideflood/
"PS I submitted this essay in Nov 2017 to the National
Association of Scholars who declined to publish it because
it did not fit within our current editorial plans for Academic
Questions.???"
An earlier example of the abject failure of peer-review
in archaeology is:
Cholleti, E.R., Vaddadi, K. and Yadav, A.H.K., 2017.
Puratana Aakasha-Yantrika Nirmana Sadhanavasthu
(Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials).
Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(8), pp.7704-7713.
Apparently, the editors had a change of mind and the
"Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials"
paper was only a couple of months ago retracted.
RETRACTED: Puratana Aakasha-Yantrika Nirmana Sadhanavasthu
(Ancient Aero-mechanical manufacturing materials)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785317314001
Have fun,
Paul
Paul V. Heinrich
9887 Kinglet drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Heinrich4